Classifying Volunteers Participated in Search and Rescue Activities: A Comparative Analysis of TOPSIS-Sort and ORESTE-Sort Methods

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2298/YJOR250515006O

Keywords:

Search and rescue, volunteer classification, TOPSIS-Sort, ORESTE-Sort

Abstract

Volunteers collaborate with professionals to provide institutional assistance in various areas; their management differs from that of professionals. To maximise volunteer productivity, categorising volunteers according to their knowledge and experience levels and distributing tasks increases volunteer retention and task efficiency. This study categorizes volunteers into four groups, fulfilling nine criteria identified through a literature review of search and rescue activities. TOPSIS-Sort and ORESTE-Sort (Optimist and Pessimist approaches) are employed in classification. Only one alternative is consistently assigned to the same class across all methods. While ORESTE-Sort offers greater flexibility and three distinct classification outcomes, it is more complex and sensitive to threshold values. TOPSIS-Sort, though simpler and producing a single classification, requires criterion weight. The Wilcoxon signed rank test is applied to evaluate the similarity between ORESTE-Sort and TOPSIS-Sort results; there are significant differences between the two methods. The study concludes by comparing the methods' applications, steps, and solution approaches, highlighting their respective advantages and disadvantages, and suggesting directions for future research.

References

“Turkish Strategy Development Presidency.” https://www.sbb.gov.tr/ (accessed Apr. 06, 2023).

J. Qin, Y. Liang, L. Martinez, A. Ishizaka, and W. Pedrycz, “ORESTE-SORT: a novel multiple criteria sorting method for sorting port group competitiveness,” Annals of Operations Research, vol. 325, no. 2, pp. 875–909, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.1007/s10479-022-04991-y.

D. Endo and K. Sugita, “A volunteer classification method for disaster recovery,” Cloud and Internet Computing, pp. 436–439, Nov. 2010, doi: 10.1109/3pgcic.2010.73.

G. Urrea, A. J. Pedraza‐Martinez, and M. Besiou, “Volunteer management in charity storehouses: experience, congestion and operational performance,” Production and Operations Management, vol. 28, no. 10, pp. 2653–2671, Jul. 2019, doi: 10.1111/poms.13073.

Ozdemir,U., S. Mete, and M. Gul, “CLASSIFICATION OF VOLUNTEERS FOR SEARCH AND RESCUE ACTIVITIES TO ASSIGNMENT IN HUMANITARIAN ORGANIZATIONS USING INTEGRATED AHP- TOPSIS- SORT METHOD,” ISAHP Proceedings, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.13033/isahp.y2022.023.

K. Lassiter, A. Alwahishie, and K. Taaffe, “Improving volunteer productivity and retention during humanitarian relief efforts,” International Journal of Supply Chain Management, vol. 3, no. 2, Jun. 2014, [Online]. Available: https://ojs.excelingtech.co.uk/index.php/IJSCM/article/download/901/547.

S. Corrente, Y. De Smet, M. Doumpos, S. Greco, and C. Zopounidis, “Classification, sorting and clustering methods based on multiple criteria: recent trends,” Annals of Operations Research, vol. 325, no. 2, pp. 767–770, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10479-023-05356-9.

H. F. Sabokbar, A. Hosseini, A. Banaitis, and N. Banaitiene, “A NOVEL SORTING METHOD TOPSIS-SORT: AN APPLICATION FOR TEHRAN ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY EVALUATION,” E+M Ekonomie a Management, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 87–104, Jan. 2016, doi: 10.15240/tul/001/2016-2-006.

D. F. De Lima Silva and A. T. De Almeida Filho, “Sorting with TOPSIS through boundary and characteristic profiles,” Computers & Industrial Engineering, vol. 141, p. 106328, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2020.106328.

L. Ocampo, R. A. Tanaid, A. M. Tiu, E. Selerio, and K. Yamagishi, “Classifying the degree of exposure of customers to COVID-19 in the restaurant industry: A novel intuitionistic fuzzy set extension of the TOPSIS-Sort,” Applied Soft Computing, vol. 113, p. 107906, Sep. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2021.107906.

M. Gül, “A Quantitative Occupational Risk Assessment Methodology Based on TOPSIS-Sort with its Application in Aluminum Extrusion Industry,” International Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 163–172, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.29132/ijpas.943612.

K. Yamagishi and L. Ocampo, “Utilizing TOPSIS-Sort for sorting tourist sites for perceived COVID-19 exposure,” Current Issues in Tourism, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 168–178, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.1080/13683500.2021.1918070.

U. Ozdemir, S. Mete, and M. Gul, “Determining the criterion weights for the selection of volunteers in humanitarian organizations by the Best-Worst method,” in Lecture notes in operations research, 2023, pp. 155–167. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-40328-6_9.

A. Ishizaka and P. Nemery, “Assigning machines to incomparable maintenance strategies with ELECTRE-SORT,” Omega, vol. 47, pp. 45–59, Mar. 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.omega.2014.03.006.

D. Liang, Y. Fu, and A. Ishizaka, “A consensual group ELECTRE-SORT approach considering the incomparable classes with the application of machine maintenance strategy assignment,” Omega, vol. 118, p. 102849, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.omega.2023.102849.

R. Suson et al., “Quasi-experimental quality evaluation of educational-purposed user-generated contents under a stochastic multi-criteria environment,” Applied Artificial Intelligence, vol. 38, no. 1, Aug. 2024, doi: 10.1080/08839514.2024.2389501.

U. Ozdemir, S. Mete, and M. Gul, “Evaluation and Classification of Emergency and Disaster Assembly Areas with ORESTE-Sort,” Sustainability, vol. 18, no. 3, p. 1281, Jan. 2026, doi: 10.3390/su18031281. 2016.

“International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies et al., World Disasters Report 2016. [Online]. FINAL_web.pdf. Available: https://www.ifrc.org/sites/default/files/WDR-2016

J. D. Goltz and K. J. Tierney, “EMERGENCY RESPONSE: LESSONS LEARNED FROM THE KOBE EARTHQUAKE,” BUniversity of Delaware, Disaster Research Center, p. 28, Jan. 1997, [Online]. Available: https://dspace.udel.edu/handle/19716/202.

H. F. O’Neil and R. Wainess, “Final Report: Assessment in team games,” Dec. 2004. doi: 10.21236/ada432806.

R. Duvekot, Managing European diversity in lifelong learning: The Many Perspectives of the Valuation of Prior Learning in the European Workplace. 2007.

A. Khasanzyanova, “How volunteering helps students to develop soft skills,” International Review of Education, vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 363–379, May 2017, doi: 10.1007/s11159-017-9645-2.

F. Jannat, A. Ardalan, M. Malekpour, G. Masoumi, and M. Vahid-Dastjerdi, “Selection criteria of hospital volunteers for the provision of health services in disasters,” Health in Emergencies & Disasters Quarterly, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 139–144, Jul. 2017, doi: 10.18869/nrip.hdq.2.3.139.

E. D. Von Heimburg, A. K. R. Rasmussen, and J. I. Medbø, “Physiological responses of firefighters and performance predictors during a simulated rescue of hospital patients,” Ergonomics, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 111–126, Feb. 2006, doi: 10.1080/00140130500435793..

G. De Cubber et al., Chapter Introduction to the use of Robotic tools for search and rescue. 2017.

S. O’Brien, F. Federici, P. Cadwell, J. Marlowe, and B. Gerber, “Language translation during disaster: A comparative analysis of five national approaches,” International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, vol. 31, pp. 627–636, Jul. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.07.006..

H. Pastijn and J. Leysen, “CONSTRUCTING AN OUTRANKING RELATION WITH ORESTE,” in Elsevier eBooks, 1989, pp. 1255–1268. doi: 10.1016/b978-0-08-037938-8.50010-0.

F. Wilcoxon, “Probability tables for individual comparisons by ranking methods,” Biometrics, vol. 3, no. 3, p. 119, Sep. 1947, doi: 10.2307/3001946.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-07

How to Cite

Ozdemir, U., Mete, S., & Gul, M. (2026). Classifying Volunteers Participated in Search and Rescue Activities: A Comparative Analysis of TOPSIS-Sort and ORESTE-Sort Methods. Yugoslav Journal of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.2298/YJOR250515006O

Issue

Section

Research Articles